Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on growing your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?
Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.
Numerous female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.
Some participants modified their profiles to include what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.
The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.
Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.
Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.
Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.
Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.
"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.
Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline significantly.
The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.
Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.
"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male swaggering around."
She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."
Some testers experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and engagement.
"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.
These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and social space.
Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.
According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.
The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."
Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.
As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.
"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."
Agile coach and software developer with over a decade of experience in transforming teams and delivering innovative solutions.